Settings and activity

2 results found

1. Reconcile via the API

   279 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   243 comments  ·  Accounting API » Banking  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   declined  ·  AdminKelly (Admin, Xero Developer Centre) responded

   Thank you for the continued feedback and for your patience on this long‑running request. We know that programmatic bank reconciliation and AI‑driven workflows are increasingly important to many of you, and we understand the frustration that this capability is not available via the Xero API.

   
   

   After reviewing this again with our legal, risk and banking teams, we have confirmed that we will not be adding the ability to reconcile bank statement lines via the API or to expose unreconciled bank statement data via the public API.

   
   

   There are a few key reasons for this decision:

   1. Regulatory and contractual obligations on raw bank data. Unreconciled bank statement lines are “raw” banking data – unmodified information that comes directly from banks. In markets such as Australia, this data is treated as banking data under consumer data rights regimes. Sharing it on to third parties (including via an open API) would require us to treat every consuming app as if it were a regulated data recipient, with substantial security, accreditation and liability obligations that sit on Xero as an intermediary as well as on those third parties. We have taken a policy decision not to operate as an intermediary for redistributing raw bank statement data.This ensures that the highest standards of banking security are maintained directly between the customer and their financial institution.
   2. Our data‑sharing boundary: unreconciled vs reconciled data. We draw a clear line between:

   • Unreconciled statement data, which is banking data supplied to us by banks and subject to the obligations above; and
   • Reconciled transaction data, which has been improved within Xero (for example, matched to contacts, invoices or accounts) and for which Xero is the custodian on behalf of the customer.

   1. We can expose certain reconciled/derived data through specific endpoints such as the Finance API’s Bank Statements Plus in limited, finance‑focused scenarios, but those endpoints are not designed or licensed for broad, high‑volume access to raw bank feeds or for third‑party replication of Xero’s bank reconciliation engine.
   2. Why “reconcile via the API” falls on the wrong side of that line. Supporting full reconciliation via the API would, in practice, require programmatic access to unreconciled statement lines and a way to push reconciliation decisions back into Xero. That would effectively recreate bank reconciliation workflows outside Xero while still relying on Xero to redistribute raw bank data, which is exactly the pattern our regulatory, security and contractual constraints are designed to avoid. For these reasons, this is not something we can safely or responsibly offer as an open API capability.

   
   

   We recognise that a small number of existing partner applications continue to receive limited access to certain statement data under legacy, contract-specific arrangements that pre‑date this policy. These specific arrangements are strictly managed under heightened security and compliance terms. To ensure we meet our current regulatory and risk standards, we are not extending these legacy permissions to new partners or applying them to any new use cases.

   
   

   We also hear the concern that “this is customer data and customers should be able to use it where they choose”. We agree that customers should have access to their own banking information, and open banking frameworks are designed to give customers direct access to that data from their bank or banking aggregator, without Xero sitting in the middle as a redistributor. For apps that need raw bank statements to power AI or other automation, the right pattern is to source that data directly from the bank or an accredited open‑banking provider, and then connect into Xero using the data structures we do expose.

   
   

   Our strategy for bank reconciliation is to invest in automation inside Xero, where we can manage risk, performance and user experience end‑to‑end. That includes features such as bank rules, suggested matches, cash coding, and newer improvements like statement-period bank reconciliation, enhanced bank feeds, and our AI-powered automation features, rather than exposing the underlying feeds for external reconciliation logic.

   
   

   We will continue to review our approach as regulation, banking connectivity and customer needs evolve, but we want to be clear and transparent that this specific request will remain declined under our current legal and risk framework. We genuinely appreciate the thought and passion that has gone into this thread, and we’ll keep focusing our efforts on making in‑product reconciliation as efficient and intelligent as we can, within those constraints.

   Thank you for the continued feedback and for your patience on this long‑running request. We know that programmatic bank reconciliation and AI‑driven workflows are increasingly important to many of you, and we understand the frustration that this capability is not available via the Xero API.

   
   

   After reviewing this again with our legal, risk and banking teams, we have confirmed that we will not be adding the ability to reconcile bank statement lines via the API or to expose unreconciled bank statement data via the public API.

   
   

   There are a few key reasons for this decision:

   1. Regulatory and contractual obligations on raw bank data. Unreconciled bank statement lines are “raw” banking data – unmodified information that comes directly from banks. In markets such as Australia, this data is treated as banking data under consumer data rights regimes. Sharing it on to third parties (including via an open API) would require us… more
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Martin Thompson commented  ·  Dec 22, 2025  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   Yeah - your reponse to this is just lazy I think. This would save a ton of time.
   - Post a batch of known transactions against a statement line
   - Api responds with "sucess" OR a list of missing transactions and amount variance

   We already have fine grained access to the bank statement data! It is just taking the work out of the UI and allowing it to be automated.

   Save Submitting...
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Martin Thompson commented  ·  Dec 21, 2017  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   You should do a survey! You would need to explain the benefits.
   - This feature is a matter of " you don't know what you don't know" . If people really understood the value of this feature then everyone would be using it.
   - This could potentially save businesses (consolidated) millions of hours of manually reconcilliations
   - It would help eliminate human error and monotonous tasks

   The other issue with this is that it it the partners and developers who want the feature , but if the end user understood the potential of automating reconcilliations and the time it would save.. then everybody would use it. Unfortunately for the value to be fully realised is a 2 step process:

   1) the software or recon screens need to be developed ( for example matching credit card transactions and programmatically working out exchange variances )

   2) The end user uses the addon to reduce the amount of manual reconcilliation / matching - and at the same time reduces human error.

   Save Submitting...

2. Should be able to retrieve and set Inventory Item status.

   104 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   37 comments  ·  Accounting API » Items / Inventory  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Public API PM responded
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Martin Thompson commented  ·  Sep 20, 2023  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   Adam - at least provide a workaround. You don't need to implement it in the api calling , but at least put it in the response. You are already returning "StatusAttributeString" always returned with "null" - just make the status "Deleted" , "Archived" or "Active" . there are no changes to the API call , no changes to the struacture of the response and it allows us to filter the Items with accuracy. NOT HARD.

   Save Submitting...
   Martin Thompson supported this idea  ·  Sep 20, 2023