Skip to content

Andrew Ardron

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 286 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Ardron supported this idea  · 
  2. 112 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Ardron supported this idea  · 
  3. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Ardron shared this idea  · 
  4. 244 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Ardron commented  · 

    Please can we have this feature. It is a nonsense that key data like this just isnt available via the API, and the "under review" and the official statement from Adam are now a year old

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Ardron commented  · 

    I can see that enabling write on this flag via the API may be more complex and need more testing, but surely at least exposing it's value for read-only purposes would be trivial and require minimal testing!!

    Andrew Ardron supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base